Salon posted an interview today with Georgetown theologian John Haught about his response to the New Atheism as embodied by Christopher Hitchens, Richard Dawkins, and others. It’s worth reading insofar as it reveals that those on the “spiritual” side of things really don’t understand atheism in a very fundamental way, just as atheists don’t really understand religion and the need for god. And I should know — I’m an atheist. The need for faith is something I can understand on an intellectual level, but not on an emotional one.
Here’s a quote:
But why can’t you have hope if you don’t believe in God?
You can have hope. But the question is, can you justify the hope? I don’t have any objection to the idea that atheists can be good and morally upright people. But we need a worldview that is capable of justifying the confidence that we place in our minds, in truth, in goodness, in beauty. I argue that an atheistic worldview is not capable of justifying that confidence. Some sort of theological framework can justify our trust in meaning, in goodness, in reason.
By referring to hope, what Haught really means is hope for life after death, hope that there’s something more than the natural world. He believes that atheism is a state of nihilism and negativity, that without hope for a future after death, life itself is without meaning.
But for me, it’s the finite span of life — the blink of an eye and you’re gone reality we all face — that gives me hope. It’s the great fortune to have experienced all this, to have fathered two daughters, enjoyed art and music, that gives me hope and meaning. The luck of it all! If the wrong sperm fertilized the wrong egg at the wrong moment, none of us would be here. To have come as far as we all have is truly remarkable.
Everything around us is dependent on a chain of stunning coincidences going all the way back to the Big Bang. Is that so terrible? The awesomeness of an infinite Universe, propelled along by accidents is far more humbling to me than the idea of a vengeful creator who forced his only son to suffer so that the rest of us could absolve ourselves of our mistakes. I don’t begrudge other people their need to believe in the myth, that it’s the only thing that keeps them going, but why does it trouble them so much that there are people who cannot bring themselves to pretend to be religious? And why do they have to project despair on us, as if our lives are meaningless without what George Carlin referred to as a “Magic Man in the Sky” to guide our way from birth to death?
As a boy, I never really believed in God, despite going to church, or the magnetic evangelical influence of certain friends and family. When I looked into my dying father’s eyes and saw a man broken by sickness and filled with fear of death, I didn’t glimpse God so much as the inevitable end we all someday face alone. The realization that there’s nothing more than life brought me a peace I’d never been able to have with religion — an acceptance that someday I will die. And it’s not all bad — it’s just the way things are.
When my aunt visited me last year and was startled by how much I reminded her of my father, it was clear to me that some part of my father was in me. That he continued after death, and when I look at my daugthers and see so much of myself in them, and so much of my mother and my wife, and the grandfather they will never meet, I know that this is how we reach everlasting life. By passing our traits down through our children — through genes and nurturing love.
And so I don’t fear death. Because although my own consciousness will end, never again to return, there will be bits of me alive in my children. And that is what gives me hope. That they will live long lives and live to see themselves and the people they love in their own children and carry on the wonderous chain of life.